Cover
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026)

Published: March 31, 2026

Pages: 1-12

Research Article

Comparative Analysis of Fatigue Performance in Asphalt Concrete Modified with Nano-Alumina and Nano-Silica

Amjad H. Albayati 1 Ali M. Al-Hamdou 1 Yu Wang 2
1 University of Baghdad
2 School of Science, Engineering & Environment, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK
History
  • Received: December 4, 2025
  • Revised: December 24, 2025
  • Accepted: March 12, 2026
  • Available Online: March 31, 2026
DOI

https://doi.org/10.65505/ETES-25-0019

Abstract

This comprehensive study undertakes a two-tiered comparative analysis to systematically evaluate the fatigue and cracking performance of a 40-50 penetration grade asphalt binder and its corresponding asphalt concrete mixtures, modified with varying dosages (2%, 4%, and 6% by binder weight) of Nano-Alumina (NA) and Nano-Silica (NS). The experimental methodology involved extensive binder-level testing, including the evaluation of physical properties (penetration, softening point, ductility), rheological behavior (Rotational Viscosity (RV)), and fatigue characteristics using the Superpave parameter G* sin δ and the advanced Linear Amplitude Sweep (LAS) test. Furthermore, compatibility was assessed via storage stability and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The research culminated in mixture-level performance evaluation using the Indirect Tensile Cracking Test (IDEAL-CT) to derive the Cracking Tolerance Index (CT-Index), Flexibility Index (FI), and Crack Resistance Index (CRI). The results confirmed that both nanomaterials significantly enhance binder stiffness and thermal stability. Nano-Alumina (NA) consistently induced the most profound stiffening effect, reflected by a major reduction in penetration. Rheological and LAS testing indicated that NA provides a stable and progressive, dose-proportional enhancement in fatigue life from 2% to 6%, attributed to the formation of a sustained nanoscale reinforcement network. Conversely, Nano-Silica (NS) exhibited a potent viscosity-building effect due to its high surface area, achieving superior initial cracking tolerance and fatigue life at low concentrations (2% to 4%). Crucially, the study identified a narrow optimal range for NS; concentrations at 6% led to an adverse reduction in fatigue resistance (G* sin δ increase) and diminished flexibility, suggesting a constraint imposed by excessive stiffening and potential particle agglomeration. Mixture-level IDEAL-CT results further validated these trends: NA offered a balanced overall contribution, maximizing the CT-Index at 6% and CRI at 4%, while NS yielded an exceptionally high CT- Index value at 2% but showed a decline in performance at higher contents. The overall findings recommend an optimal practical dosage of 2-4% for NS and 4-6% for NA, underscoring the necessity of material-specific optimization for achieving enhanced durability and fatigue life under repeated loading.

Keywords

References

  1. B. Sengoz and A. Topal, “Use of asphalt roofing shingle waste in HMA,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 337–346, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.08.005
  2. D. Cheng, D. Little, R. Lytton, and J. Holste, “Surface energy measurement of asphalt and its application to predicting fatigue and healing in asphalt mixtures,” Transp. Res. Rec., vol. 1810, pp. 44–53, 2002. https://doi.org/10.3141/1810-06
  3. R. S. Lakes, Viscoelastic Materials. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009.
  4. C. Hintz, “Understanding mechanisms leading to asphalt binder fatigue,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA, 2012.
  5. H. Wen, “Fatigue performance evaluation of WesTrack asphalt mixtures based on viscoelastic analysis of indirect tensile test,” Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC, USA, 2001.
  6. A. F. Mirhosseini et al., “Evaluating fatigue behavior of asphalt binders and mixes containing date seed ash,” J. Civ. Eng. Manag., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1164–1175, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1396560
  7. F. Xiao, S. Amirkhanian, and C. H. Juang, “Prediction of fatigue life of rubberized asphalt concrete mixtures containing reclaimed asphalt pavement using artificial neural networks,” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 253–261, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:6(253)
  8. E. Santagata et al., “Correlating creep properties of bituminous binders with anti-rutting performance of corresponding mixtures,” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.008
  9. N. Saboo and P. Kumar, “Performance characterization of polymer modified asphalt binders and mixes,” Adv. Civ. Eng., vol. 2016, Art. no. 5938270, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5938270
  10. F. Safaei, C. Castorena, and Y. R. Kim, “Linking asphalt binder fatigue to asphalt mixture fatigue performance using viscoelastic continuum damage modeling,” Mech. Time-Depend. Mater., vol. 20, pp. 299–323, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-016-9304-1
  11. C. Fang et al., “Nanomaterials applied in asphalt modification: A review,” J. Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 589–594, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2013.04.008
  12. M. Saltan, S. Terzi, and S. Karahancer, “Examination of hot mix asphalt and binder performance modified with nano silica,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 156, pp. 976–984, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.069
  13. F. Leiva-Villacorta and A. Vargas-Nordcbeck, “Optimum content of nano-silica to ensure proper performance of an asphalt binder,” Road Mater. Pavement Des., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 414–425, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1385510
  14. H. Nazari, K. Naderi, and F. M. Nejad, “Improving aging resistance and fatigue performance of asphalt binders using inorganic nanoparticles,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 170, pp. 591–602, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.107
  15. G. Shafabakhsh, M. Rajabi, and A. Sahaf, “The fatigue behavior of SBS/nanosilica composite modified asphalt binder and mixture,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 229, Art. no. 116796, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116796
  16. A. Lotfi-Eghlim and M. S. Karimi, “Fatigue behavior of hot mix asphalt modified with nano Al₂O₃—An experimental study,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J., vol. 10, no. 31, pp. 58–63, 2016. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/64011
  17. S. Karahancer, “Effect of aluminum oxide nanoparticle on modified bitumen and hot mix asphalt,” Pet. Sci. Technol., vol. 38, no. 13, pp. 773–784, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2020.1783292
  18. F. S. Bhat and M. S. Mir, “Investigating the effects of nano Al₂O₃ on high and intermediate temperature performance properties of asphalt binder,” Road Mater. Pavement Des., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2604–2625, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2020.1778509
  19. Y. Mamuye, N.-D. Do, and M.-C. Liao, “Nano-Al₂O₃ composite on intermediate and high temperature properties of neat and modified asphalt binders,” SSRN, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4017442
  20. AASHTO M 320, Standard Specification for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2013.
  21. AASHTO T 49, Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2020.
  22. AASHTO T 51, Standard Test Method for Ductility of Asphalt Materials. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2020.
  23. AASHTO T 53, Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus). Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2020.
  24. M. Enieb and A. Diab, “Characteristics of asphalt binder and mixture containing nanosilica,” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 148–157, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.009
  25. G. H. Hamedi and N. Esmaeili, “Investigating the effects of nano-materials on moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures containing glass cullets,” AUT J. Civ. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 107–118, 2018. https://doi.org/10.22060/ajce.2018.14665.5492
  26. ASTM D3515-01, Standard Specification for Hot-Mixed, Hot-Laid Bituminous Paving Mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM Int., 2001.
  27. A. H. Albayati et al., “Experimental study to investigate performance-related properties of modified asphalt concrete using nanomaterials Al₂O₃, SiO₂, and TiO₂,” Materials, vol. 17, no. 17, Art. no. 4279, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17174279
  28. AASHTO T 315-12, Standard Method for Determining Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC, USA: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2012.
  29. AASHTO T 391-20, Standard Method for Determining Asphalt Binder Fatigue Properties Using Linear Amplitude Sweep (LAS) Test. Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2020.
  30. AASHTO T 240-13, Standard Method for Effect of Heat and Air on Asphalt Binder Using Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test (RTFOT). Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2013.
  31. AASHTO R 28-12, Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV). Washington, DC, USA: AASHTO, 2012.
  32. F. Zhang, J. Yu, and J. Han, “Effects of thermal oxidative ageing on modified asphalts,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 129–137, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.048.